Rejections occur at various stages: Desk rejection (rejection upon submission) Rejection before peer review by the Academic Editor; Rejection after peer Editing and proofreading services for a publication-ready manuscript, Customized service packs to match all publication needs, Expert help for all academic translation needs. A welcome message is winging its way to you now. Look for controversies and unexplained findings. Next is Revise and Resubmit, which means "we think we want it, but change some stuff first" and does NOT indicate that they had a problem with the paper beyond the stuff listed in the reviews. What is the difference between major revision and reject and resubmit? Next, consider privately whether you will revise. Whats Hot and Cooking In Scholarly Publishing. Second, journals do lose a lot of credibility when the process takes forever. In the meantime, two resources I highly recommend writers check out are Janet Reids Query Shark blog, which has years worth of feedback on queries good, bad, and ugly, and the hashtag #10Queries on Twitter. Academics in general seem torn over making revisions in peer review. What is the difference between minor and major revision? If authors make a considered effort to address reviewers comments, then in all proba- bility, the resubmitted article will be accepted for publication. A polite rejection is a slightly longer email than a form rejection. Since this experience is common among researchers, if you think you need it, give yourself some time to recover from rejection. Its Friday, 6:57 p.m. in the newsroom, and no one wants to be there. Throw the manuscript away and never resubmit it: Rejection can be disheartening, and it may be tempting to decide that its not worth the trouble of resubmitting. If not, what would be required to make their case credible? How to resubmit a rejected PF claim online? Subscribe and get curated content that will give impetus to your research paper. Reject and resubmit means the research article is rejected in its current form. In many fields, the reviewer pool is smaller than you would think. If you need clarification on the agents feedback, I would only ask them about it directly if they seem personable and easily approachable. Z" target="_self" href="/collection/products-a-to-z">Products A->Z. When expanded it provides a list of search options that will switch the search inputs to match the current selection. Although rarely discussed, most researchers need time to process this and deal with a manuscript rejection letter. What does it add to the subject area compared with other published material? Does it follow best practice and meet ethical standards? You should read all the instructions in that letter carefully. Kbler-Ross, E., & Kessler, D. (2005). Though the resubmission rate is higher than standard form rejection, if I keep getting these and nothing else, Ill consider a revision. I dont come to this decision without due consideration, though, and the rejection itself is often the biggest determining factor on whether a story gets revised or resubmitted. For journals I have managed, the number of major revision papers that are eventually accepted stays solidly between 80-90%. If not, but more than one agent has mentioned the same concern, reassess your manuscript to determine if there arent some weak links you havent fixed yet. Since the editor didn't do this, it's still possible your paper will be declined. What is the main question addressed by the research? As an aside, is it normal for people regularly submitting to journals to get the revise & resubmit response? At this point, the key is to not take the rejection of your manuscript personally. One would argue that it would need to be significantly different to the original manuscript and addressed the main reviewers comments otherwise the same reviewers are likely (from your submitted keywords) and the same outcome.